Ordinary Angels Review

Welcome, fellow movie enthusiasts! Today, we’re diving into the world of “Ordinary Angels,” a film that promises an emotional rollercoaster with a star-studded cast.

However, it seems that despite the best efforts of Alan Ritchson, the film falls short of greatness due to its chaotic editing style. Join us as we explore the highs and lows of this drama and uncover why it fails to make a lasting impact.

A Glimpse into the Film

Imagine a heartbreaking scene between a widowed father and his critically ill daughter. The raw emotions and unspoken words fill the air, momentarily captivating our hearts. But alas, the moment is abruptly cut short, and we’re thrust into the world of Hillary Swank’s vivacious character, Sharon Stevens.

Alan Ritchson’s Performance Shines

Amidst the chaos, there is a silver lining in the form of Alan Ritchson’s exceptional performance. Known for his leading role in the popular Prime Video series “Reacher,” Ritchson brings depth and authenticity to his portrayal of Ed Schmitt, the grieving father. His emotional range tugs at our heartstrings, creating genuine and touching moments, especially in his interactions with Michelle, his daughter.

Hilary Swank’s Disruptive Portrayal

While Ritchson’s performance provides a glimmer of hope, it is Hilary Swank’s portrayal of Sharon that disrupts the film’s flow. Sharon, a hairdresser from Kentucky, enters the picture with a Christian-centric narrative that overshadows the intended commentary on healthcare. While the intention may have been admirable, it ultimately takes away from the film’s potential impact.

Chaotic Editing Hinders Engagement

One of the major shortcomings of “Ordinary Angels” lies in its chaotic editing style. The film rushes through poignant scenes, barely allowing us to connect with the characters on a deeper level. Instead, it favors exaggerated performances and flashy moments, sacrificing opportunities for introspection and critique of the US healthcare system.

Missed Opportunities for Critique

In a film based on a true story, there is ample room for exploring the failures of the healthcare system. Unfortunately, “Ordinary Angels” barely scratches the surface of this critical issue. The film’s focus on Christian-centric themes and dialogue leaves little room for pointed commentary on the healthcare system’s shortcomings. It’s a missed opportunity that leaves us wanting more.

The Final Verdict

In the end, “Ordinary Angels” falls short of its potential. While Alan Ritchson’s performance brings depth and emotion to the film, the chaotic editing and prioritization of a Christian-centric narrative hinder its impact. The missed opportunities for critique and exploration of the healthcare system leave us yearning for a more thought-provoking experience.

FAQs

1. Is “Ordinary Angels” based on a true story?
Yes, “Ordinary Angels” is based on a true story, adding an extra layer of emotional depth to the film.

2. Does Hilary Swank’s performance overshadow Alan Ritchson’s acting?
While Hilary Swank’s portrayal of Sharon Stevens disrupts the film, Alan Ritchson’s performance shines through, providing moments of genuine emotion and connection.

3. Does “Ordinary Angels” critique the US healthcare system?
Unfortunately, “Ordinary Angels” misses the mark when it comes to critiquing the US healthcare system. The film focuses more on a Christian-centric narrative, leaving little room for commentary on healthcare shortcomings.